Rick
2024-11-09 19:20:01 UTC
One of the problems with the auction this time is that it wasn't really
an auction. Since no one wanted to be left with the most money, whoever
had the most money just bid enough to beat everyone out on each item.
There wasn't a lot of actual bidding in the traditional auction sense.
Someone on one of the podcasts suggested that at the end of the auction
there should be a coin toss to determine whether the person with the
most money or the person with the least money should lose their vote.
Problem with this is that there might be ties for person with least
money since more than one person could have zero left. A better idea
might be to have some kind of challenge at the end between the person or
persons with the most remaining money and least remaining money. Loser
loses vote. Maybe this is where they pull out that gross larvae eating
contest or even the fish eyes - last person to swallow loses vote.
Anyone refusing to do it, even if more than one, loses vote.
an auction. Since no one wanted to be left with the most money, whoever
had the most money just bid enough to beat everyone out on each item.
There wasn't a lot of actual bidding in the traditional auction sense.
Someone on one of the podcasts suggested that at the end of the auction
there should be a coin toss to determine whether the person with the
most money or the person with the least money should lose their vote.
Problem with this is that there might be ties for person with least
money since more than one person could have zero left. A better idea
might be to have some kind of challenge at the end between the person or
persons with the most remaining money and least remaining money. Loser
loses vote. Maybe this is where they pull out that gross larvae eating
contest or even the fish eyes - last person to swallow loses vote.
Anyone refusing to do it, even if more than one, loses vote.